<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: What if Automattic Began Charging To Use WordPress?</title> <atom:link href="http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress</link> <description>A blog all about WordPress. Yes, we&#039;re a bit meta.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:03:24 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: matt</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-340276</link> <dc:creator>matt</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 02:01:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-340276</guid> <description>Tough question. On one hand, Matt seems like such an awesome guy and I wish him tons of success, including financial. On the other hand, I wouldn&#039;t even bat an eye switching to Drupal or some other open source platform.WordPress has many other options to make money if they want or need to. How about creating a certification program? Many designers and developers would pay for such a distinction. That&#039;s just one half-baked idea, there is no shortage of options for those smart folks...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tough question. On one hand, Matt seems like such an awesome guy and I wish him tons of success, including financial. On the other hand, I wouldn&#8217;t even bat an eye switching to Drupal or some other open source platform.</p><p>WordPress has many other options to make money if they want or need to. How about creating a certification program? Many designers and developers would pay for such a distinction. That&#8217;s just one half-baked idea, there is no shortage of options for those smart folks&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Cosmin</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4389</link> <dc:creator>Cosmin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:38:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4389</guid> <description>Are you high man?Wordpress IS THE BEST because it&#039;s free and thus, many valuable people joined the community!Matt, don&#039;t you ever charge money for Wordpress, you know it damn well it&#039;ll be the biggest mistake you could possibly do :) tricking the open-source community in such a way is pure suicide :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you high man?</p><p>WordPress IS THE BEST because it&#8217;s free and thus, many valuable people joined the community!</p><p>Matt, don&#8217;t you ever charge money for WordPress, you know it damn well it&#8217;ll be the biggest mistake you could possibly do <img
src='http://cdn.wpcandy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> tricking the open-source community in such a way is pure suicide <img
src='http://cdn.wpcandy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Fink About It</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4388</link> <dc:creator>Fink About It</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:04:02 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4388</guid> <description>Finally, we have a free application that works and is loved by everybody. No Charging, please.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally, we have a free application that works and is loved by everybody. No Charging, please.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alison</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4387</link> <dc:creator>Alison</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 04:37:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4387</guid> <description>I wouldn&#039;t pay for it. I&#039;d switch to something else, for sure. WP would eventually die out as most products always do when they cost money, because they are depreciated easily.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t pay for it. I&#8217;d switch to something else, for sure. WP would eventually die out as most products always do when they cost money, because they are depreciated easily.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jason</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4386</link> <dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 14:28:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4386</guid> <description>if it gets paid service, lol forget about it than, Sooner or later wp will die for sure. cause their competitors gonna kill them pretty soon. Wordpress got famous, just because its open source and free to use, or else there are quite a lot alternatives available, people will shift to those, im sure.So in my opinion it will be a pretty foolish move, which im sure they wont ever take.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it gets paid service, lol forget about it than, Sooner or later wp will die for sure. cause their competitors gonna kill them pretty soon. WordPress got famous, just because its open source and free to use, or else there are quite a lot alternatives available, people will shift to those, im sure.</p><p>So in my opinion it will be a pretty foolish move, which im sure they wont ever take.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Chris O'Donnell</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4385</link> <dc:creator>Chris O'Donnell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 22:19:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4385</guid> <description>I don&#039;t use WordPress, but if I did, I&#039;d be looking for a more flexible admin - not as complex as, say, Django or Ellington, but something more like ExpressionEngine. I&#039;ll admit that I don&#039;t know PHP, and don&#039;t plan on learning it. It seems like there are better and newer thing out there, kind of like learning how to use tables to lay out a site instead of Blueprint or your own CSS framework...Nevertheless, I wouldn&#039;t mind paying for WordPress. If Automattic charged $5 for each copy, they&#039;d make a fortune off licenses without scaring off the general public. It would also help keep super-cheap, no-good, pixel-pushin&#039; spam sites powered by WordPress from being as numerous as they are today.One of the only things that keeps me away from WordPress is that it&#039;s designed to Blog. That&#039;s fine for people who want to blog, but what if I&#039;d prefer to use it as a general CMS? WordPress is bloated with features specific to blogging. I don&#039;t need trackbacks on my home page. You know what I&#039;m saying here, I&#039;m not trying to put down WordPress, just point out that it&#039;s not the best CMS for client work.I would not pay for Hosted WordPress, but I wouldn&#039;t even think of using WordPress.com anyway... It&#039;s about 20% spam, in my opinion, and isn&#039;t very professional. So go ahead and charge for WordPress, it won&#039;t bother me!Screw everything I just said... open source is important, and it should stay open source. But charging for WP.com is fine with me!MT seems like a good alternative for the masses, but I like Django!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t use WordPress, but if I did, I&#8217;d be looking for a more flexible admin &#8211; not as complex as, say, Django or Ellington, but something more like ExpressionEngine. I&#8217;ll admit that I don&#8217;t know PHP, and don&#8217;t plan on learning it. It seems like there are better and newer thing out there, kind of like learning how to use tables to lay out a site instead of Blueprint or your own CSS framework&#8230;</p><p>Nevertheless, I wouldn&#8217;t mind paying for WordPress. If Automattic charged $5 for each copy, they&#8217;d make a fortune off licenses without scaring off the general public. It would also help keep super-cheap, no-good, pixel-pushin&#8217; spam sites powered by WordPress from being as numerous as they are today.</p><p>One of the only things that keeps me away from WordPress is that it&#8217;s designed to Blog. That&#8217;s fine for people who want to blog, but what if I&#8217;d prefer to use it as a general CMS? WordPress is bloated with features specific to blogging. I don&#8217;t need trackbacks on my home page. You know what I&#8217;m saying here, I&#8217;m not trying to put down WordPress, just point out that it&#8217;s not the best CMS for client work.</p><p>I would not pay for Hosted WordPress, but I wouldn&#8217;t even think of using WordPress.com anyway&#8230; It&#8217;s about 20% spam, in my opinion, and isn&#8217;t very professional. So go ahead and charge for WordPress, it won&#8217;t bother me!</p><p>Screw everything I just said&#8230; open source is important, and it should stay open source. But charging for WP.com is fine with me!</p><p>MT seems like a good alternative for the masses, but I like Django!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Phoat</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4384</link> <dc:creator>Phoat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:31:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4384</guid> <description>Automattic makes a lot of money. Just the fact that they are able to spend money to acquire other startups like Gravatar should say a lot about their income (or potential income).I personally applaud Matt and all he&#039;s accomplished. It&#039;s not easy to give something away for free and still make money from it.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Automattic makes a lot of money. Just the fact that they are able to spend money to acquire other startups like Gravatar should say a lot about their income (or potential income).</p><p>I personally applaud Matt and all he&#8217;s accomplished. It&#8217;s not easy to give something away for free and still make money from it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stacy</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4383</link> <dc:creator>Stacy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 21:10:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4383</guid> <description>If I had to start paying for WordPress, then I would just switch to Drupal.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I had to start paying for WordPress, then I would just switch to Drupal.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Shirley</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4382</link> <dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2008 04:05:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4382</guid> <description>It would never happen. It would be a bad business move because it would hurt the product.Although WP has amazing developers, it is also as good as it is because of the community. Because it is open source, users regularly test it, make suggestions for improvements, and submit plugins, widgets, themes, and other bits of addon code. If WP started charging, they&#039;d lose a lot of support. And then everyone else who created themes, plugins, widgets, etc.. would also start charging. (I know I&#039;d start charging for mine!)It&#039;d just be a mess.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would never happen. It would be a bad business move because it would hurt the product.</p><p>Although WP has amazing developers, it is also as good as it is because of the community. Because it is open source, users regularly test it, make suggestions for improvements, and submit plugins, widgets, themes, and other bits of addon code. If WP started charging, they&#8217;d lose a lot of support. And then everyone else who created themes, plugins, widgets, etc.. would also start charging. (I know I&#8217;d start charging for mine!)</p><p>It&#8217;d just be a mess.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: What if Automattic Began Charging To Use WordPress? &#171; Open Source Customization overview</title><link>http://wpcandy.com/thinks/what-if-automattic-began-charging-to-use-wordpress#comment-4381</link> <dc:creator>What if Automattic Began Charging To Use WordPress? &#171; Open Source Customization overview</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 05:42:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://wpcandy.com/?p=1432#comment-4381</guid> <description>[...] Source: [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Source: [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: basic
Database Caching 29/40 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 848/860 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via cdn.wpcandy.com

Served from: wpcandy.com @ 2012-02-09 02:48:43 -->
